![]() ![]() Maybe these ambassadors can be tagged as experts in particular hardware and software to help out users with station issues. Not one ambassador should be given 100% autonomy but maybe actions require approval of more than one ambassador. Maybe you can utilize these ambassadors to do station data quality assurance. Maybe station status returns and goes through an approval process checkpoint. This would alow stations to be custom named. Soon what will be left?Īre you planning on charging for premium services to restore functionalities to your data contributors?Īre decimals coming back? For everything: live dashboad, summary, data tables, and graphs?Ĭan you implement a reporting system so that station owners can continue to name their stations as they have for almost 2 decades?Ĭan WU come up with a core framework of functionalities that they promise to uphold to their contributors and alow at least 10 months advanced notice before retiring any more functionalities? At least 6 months would seem fair.Ĭan you create some delegated volunteer program/process where some data contributors are identified and made ambasadors and have some policing authority to help out with the limited resources that apparently WU has? Perhaps they gain some back end tools to help administer WU. Why not? You just keep removing features.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |